The Scandal of Larry Craig

The Scandal of Larry Craig Larry Craig was arrested at the Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport on a suspicion of Lewd Conduct. The date that this incident happened was on June 11th, 2007. Craig was arrested after trying to have sex with another male in the Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport bathroom. What he didnt know is that the man he was trying to have sex with ended up being an undercover officer, the officer was undercover because of complaints about a man trying to have sex with others in the bathroom, this has been going on for several weeks now. Larry Craig was the main person affected because of this incident, probably because he was the main person involved. Because of this incident Larry Craig lost many of his friends, a good amount of those friends were made through politics and were still in politics. One main friend he lost was Mitt Romney who was Governor of Massachusetts at the time of this incident. After the public heard about the incident, as you expected, there was a major backlash on Larry Craig and he was hated by many Americans. Many gay right activists were mad at Craig for making gay people look bad. At the time of this incident gays were trying to be treated equal to straight people because they werent equal at the time of this incident, so many people were mad for the sole fact that he interacted in a gay act like he did. In the end what really affected Larry Craig was that the incident cost him his political career. Larry Craig ended up serving the rest of his term as Senator because he refused to resign, but he did not end up running for re-election for the position because he knew just like everyone else did, that he would not win the re-election for Senator. He also was not liked by many other politicians after this incident. Another person affected because of the incident was Mitt Romney. Craig was one of the two Senators that were liaisons for Mitt Romneys 2008 Presidential Campaign. After this incident Mitt Romney was not a fan of Larry Craig, in fact Mitt Romney actually strongly disliked Larry Craig. Larry Craig made Mitt Romney look bad because of this incident, do the citizens of America really want a President that works with guys like this running the country? This ended up with Mitt Romney removing Larry Craig from anything to do with his Presidential Campaign then went on to talk badly about Craig to the public by saying Hes disappointed the American people (Hulse). The last person that was affected because of this incident was Mike Jones and the officer that arrested him. Mike Jones told the public that Larry Craig offered him $200 to have oral sex with him in a restroom. After this was told to the public and a reporter asked Larry Craig, he responded by saying Mike Jones was lying just to try to promote his new book about the incident between Mike and Ted Haggard (Hulse). So Larry Craig just said Mike was trying to just get money from his incident and that it isnt alright to do. Lastly, was the officer that arrested Craig. They never released the officers name, which is understandable because this was a big incident. Craig tried to have sex with him in the Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport restroom, after he made the arrest Larry Craig tried to blackmail the officer by showing his badge that showed he was a part of the government and then said So, what do you think about that? This incident occurred on August 8th, 2007. There are many facts about this government scandal. One fact is that he was arrested for disorderly conduct in the Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport. Another fact about this scandal is that Larry Craig ended up sending a signed petition to the court and the petition pled guilty for misdemeanor charge was accepted and filed to the court on August 8th, 2007. When this was released to the public he said that he regretted pleading guilty because he was innocent. He said that he only plead guilty to the charges because he wanted this to just fly over and not go on, but it ended up backfiring and lasting along time. Larry Craig said that he just wanted to get this over as quick as possible and get on with his life and duty as one of the Senators of the United States. The time frame of this incident was in August 2007. But apparently he has been doing things like this for years but never got caught or had it released to the public until now. No one really knows if these reports about it happening in the past are true, but they know that the incident in August 2007 was real and it happened. At the time of this incident many other things were also happening in the world. One surrounding circumstance was the Phoenix spacecraft launched towards Mars. They launched the Phoenix spacecraft on August 4th, 2007. Another surrounding circumstance was that the war in Afghanistan was going on. The war in Afghanistan started in October 2001 because of the tragic incident of 9/11. This war was a long war that lasted 13 years, it eventually ended in 2014, three years after the US killed the man responsible for 9/11. The mans name was Osama Bin Laden and he was killed on May 2, 2011 in Pakistan which is a country that borders Afghanistan. He was in his hideout that he had. The last thing that was a surrounding circumstance in 2007 was the Iraq war. The US was in the middle of two wars in 2007. This war started in March 2003 because of an invasion in Iraq that was led by the United States. This war was also long but didnt last as long as the war in Afghanistan. The war in Iraq lasted 8 years. It ended in December 2011 because Obama decided it was a good idea to just end the war and pull out. In this scandal there were many rumors that had spread during this scandal. After this scandal, a gay rights activist Michael Rogers came out and told the public that this wasnt the first time that Larry Craig has done something like this. He said there were multiple similar occasions that something like this had happened to other people. The first one he has tied Craig to be in happened in 1982. Rogers also said that it has been happening in multiple locations all over the United States not just in the Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport where this incident took place. All these incidents were reported to a reporter for the Idaho Statesman. Michael Rogers wasnt the only person to come out and say that Craig has done this before. Up to eight other gay men came up to the reporter for Idaho Statesman saying that they had either sexual encounters with Larry Craig or him attempting to engage in sexual conduct with them. Four of the eight men gave good details about their encounters with Craig, it wasnt proven if they had happened or not but it caused some discussion. The most recent encounter that had been reported came from a 40 year old man who claimed that he and Craig had engaged in oral sex in 2004. None of these reports had been proven true nor had they been proven false. They were all just rumors and not many know if these reports had been true or not. Because of this incident the government took a huge hit. Craig has been in politics along time and he was liked by many other politicians previous to this incident. Larry Craig lost many political friends because of this and there was a huge debate whether or not if they should allow Craig to stay as Senator. They decided that Craig could remain and serve the rest of his term as Senator. Craig did end up serving the rest of his term. Many people looked at the government badly for allowing a man who did this remain the Senator and not kicking him out of his position. They were mad because they didnt want a corrupt man helping run this country, they looked at it as not right. After Craigs term was up he did not re-run in the election as Senator because everyone knew that if he did he would not win. The only one to really suffer because of this incident is Larry Craig. After this incident Craig returned to his duty as Senator of the United States. He refused to resign from his position, but after his term as Senator he lost his job and didnt re-run in the upcoming election as Senator. This isnt the only thing that that ended for him. He ended his career in politics. Another person that you could argue suffered from this incident was Mitt Romney. Craig was one of the two Senators liaisons for Mitt Romneys 2008 presidential campaign. This incident made Romney look bad and he dropped Craig from being a part of anything to do with his presidential campaign. Mitt Romney ended up losing this election and Craig didnt impact his campaign positively. Craig wasnt the main reason he lost but would Romney have gotten more votes if this didnt happen? Nobody knows. Craig probably didnt lose the election for Romney but he sure didnt help Romneys chances. The last thing that suffered because of this incident was the government because Craig had been a part of politics for a long time. He had many friends and was trusted by many people that were in politics. This incident caused a man that was high in politics to lose his job and end his career. There were many outcomes after this Scandal. Mostly it affected Larry Craig and his life. Larry Craig ended up serving the rest of his term as the Senator, then decided that he is done with his political career after this incident. He didnt re-run because he wouldve lost and he knew that. One thing that happened that is kind of interesting is that the TV show Law and Order made an episode that replicated the whole Larry Craig scandal. The episode was called Political Animal. They used things in the episode such as the foot tapping that Craig apparently did in the stalls, and when the officer in the episode arrested the councilman, the councilman yelled Im not gay to resemble what Larry Craig also did. The last thing is the stalls in the Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport that this incident happened in started to gain notoriety. The airport then decided that they should demolish the stalls this incident occurred in and did so. In ending, this scandal wasnt one of the biggest to occur in the United States history. But the government did take a hit and this scandal was very popular and talked about. This incident will always be remembered as a weird scandal because no one really expected Craig to do something like this, yet it has been apparently going on for years and kept quiet.

History to Hrm

Evolution of HRM †¢ History – MANAGEMENT – MAN MANAGEMENT †¢ Approaches †¢ Difference in Personnel Management and HR †¢ EXAMPLES OF MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TROUGHTOUT HISTORY †¢ Ancient †¢ Medieval †¢ Modern History Of HRM †¢ Industrial Revolution – Advantages and Disadvantages †¢ Trade Union Era – World War and Post World War †¢ Social Responsibility – Paternalistic Approach †¢ Scientific Management – F. W Taylor – Henry Fayol History Of HRM †¢ Industrial Psychology – Human Factor – Human Relations, Hawthorne Experiments †¢ Behavioral Sciences – Motivation – Satisfaction Modern Management – Management By Objectives – Organization Development It all began with, role of personnel manager being: †¢ Clerk – Managing Dues †¢ Record Keeper – Managing Time Keeping †¢ Channel of Communication between Employees + Management, Recruitment & Selection †¢ Industrial Relations – Union †¢ Labour Laws– Eg. Min. Wages, PF, ESIC Laws– †¢ Welfare Officer – Recreation †¢ Training & Development Phases of Human Resource Management AND TODAY †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ Organization Development Strategic Partner Human Capital ManagementIt is a Profession Rising Prominence of the Human Resource Management: †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ Emphasis on quality Impact of technology Liberalization of Indian economy Privatization of Indian economy Globalization Rising Prominence of the Human Resource Management: †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ Changes in political philosophy Trade unionism Cutthroat competition International problems – Diversified workforce – Knowledge workers – Information Technology Approaches towards Human Beings: †¢ Mechanical approach – commodity approach or factor of production concept – up to 1920. Paternalistic Approach – from 1920 till great depressions – died during the Great Depressions of 1930s. Approaches towards Human Beings: †¢ Social System or Humanistic Approach: 1930-40 Psychologists – Mayo, Mc 40 Gregor etc. Sociologists – Blake etc. †¢ Human Resource Approach – 1940 onwards – (distinct needs, aspirations and personality) – MBO, two way communication, leadership, quality circles etc. Evolution of HRM in India 1920s – 30s Pragmatism of capitalists 1940s – 50s Technical, legalistic 1970s – 80s Professional, legalistic, impersonal 1990s PhilosophicalDIFFERENCE BETWEEN HRM/ HRD/ PRESONNEL †¢ LETS DISCUSS †¢ HRM AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ARE THE SAME †¢ Some experts assert that there is no difference between human resources and personnel management They state that management. the two terms can be used interchangeably, with no difference in meaning. In fact, the terms a re often used interchangeably in help-wanted ads and job descriptions descriptions. †¢ When looking for a job in personnel management or human resources, it is important to realize that many companies use the terms interchangeably If you are offered interchangeably. job as a personnel manager, you may be required to perform the same duties as a human resource manager, and vice versa. In some companies, a distinction is made, but the difference is very subtle. Personnel vs. Human Resource Management †¢ Human †¢ Personnel Resource Management Management †¢ Personnel means †¢ persons employed. PM is the management of people employed. HRM is the management of employees’ skills, knowledge, abilities, talents, aptitudes, creative abilities etc. Employee is treated not †¢ Employee is treated as only as economic man an economic man as his but also as social and services are exchanged psychological man. Thus for wage/salary the complete man is viewed. â₠¬ ¢ Employees are used †¢ Employees are used for the multiple mutual mostly for organizational benefit of the benefits. organization, employees and their family members. †¢ Personnel function is †¢ HRM is a strategic treated as only an management function. auxiliary. †¢ Employee is viewed as a †¢ Employee is treated as commodity or tool or a resource. quipment, which can be purchased or used. †¢ Employees are treated †¢ Employees are treated as a profit centre and as cost centre and therefore, invests capital therefore management for human resource controls the cost of development and future labour. utility. †¢ Employees are used †¢ Employees are used for mostly for organizational the multiple mutual benefits. benefit of the organization, employees and their family members. †¢ Personnel Management is more of administrative functions. †¢ Personnel function are said to be reactive †¢ Personnel function is treated as only an a uxiliary. HR, is responsible for managing a workforce as one of the primary resources that contributes to the success of an organization. †¢ HRM is a proactive function. †¢ HRM is a strategic management function. Relationship Between HRM and HRD †¢ Human resource management (HRM) encompasses many functions †¢ Human resource development (HRD) is one of the functions within HRM †¢ Personnel management Precedes the history Talent Management †¢ A dynamic, ongoing process of systematically †¢ identifying, assessing, and developing talent for †¢ future critical roles to ensure continuity and †¢ effective organizational performance. Note that some people distinguish a difference between between HRM (a major management activity)and HRD(Human Resource Development). Those people might include HRM in HRD, explaining that HRD includes the broader range of activities to develop personnel inside of organizations, including, e. g. , career development, training, organization development, etc. ? There is a long-standing argument about where HR standing HR-related functions should be organized into large organizations, eg, â€Å"should HR be in the Organization Development department or the other way around? ? The HRM function and HRD profession have undergone tremendous change over the past 20-30 years. Many years ago, large 30 organizations looked to the â€Å"Personnel Department,† mostly to manage the paperwork around hiring and paying people. More recently, organizations consider the â€Å"HR Department† as playing a major role in staffing, training and helping to manage people so that people and the organization are performing at maximum capability in a highly fulfilling manner. Jobs & Careers in HRM †¢ HR Specialist †¢ HR Manager †¢ HR Executive

Animals Act 1971 - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1632 Downloads: 2 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Law Essay Type Argumentative essay Tags: Act Essay Did you like this example? 199903 As stated in the preamble to the Act, the purpose of the Animals Act 1971 is to make provision with respect to civil liability for damage done by animals and with respect to protection of livestock from dogs; and for purposes connected with those matters. This paper compares and contrasts an action under section 2(2) of the Act with one under section 4 of the same Act. The two provisions are as follows: Section 2(2): Where any damage is caused by an animal which does not belong to a dangerous species, any person who is keeper of the animal is liable for the damage, except as otherwise provided by this Act if:- . Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Animals Act 1971" essay for you Create order the damage is of a kind which the animal, unless restrained, was likely to cause or which, if caused by the animal, was likely to be severe; and the likelihood of the damage or of its being severe was due to characteristics of the animal which are not normally found in animals of the same species or are not normally so found except at particular times or in particular circumstances; and those characteristics were known to that keeper, or were at any time known to a person who at that time had charge of the animal as that keepers servant or, if the keeper is the head of a household, if they were known to any other member of the household under the age of 16 who is also deemed to be a keeper of the animal. Section 4: Where livestock belonging to any person strays on to land in the ownership of another and: damage is done by the livestock to the land or to any property on it which is in the ownership or possession of the other person; or any expenses are reasonably incurred by that other person in keeping the livestock while it cannot be restored to the person to whom it belongs or while it is detained in pursuance of section 7 of this Act, or in ascertaining to whom it belongs; the person to whom the livestock belongs is liable for the damage or expense, except as otherwise provided by this Act. (2) For the purpose of this section any livestock belongs to the person in whose possession it is. The Act draws a distinction between animals which belongs to a dangerous species and those which do not belong to a dangerous species. The Act defines à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“speciesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  as including à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“sub-species and variety[1]. The word à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“keeperà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  mentioned in section 2(2) refers the person who owns the animal or has it in his possession. This definition is provided under section 6(3) of the same Act. The word was also interpreted by the court in Flack v Hudson[2]. The case involved a horse rider who was injured while riding the horse. The owner of the horse knew that the horse had a propensity to be frightened by agricultural machine but the rider (keeper) did not. The keeper brought an action under section 2(2) against the owner of the horse for the damage. The court held that the Animals Act 1971 Act did not limit those who could sue the keeper of an animal to strangers or third parties. In the instant case, the person in possession of the animal, who was harmed by the animal, was not the keeper and was accordingly entitled to sue the owner. With regard to the word à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“severeà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  mentioned in section 2(2), it was held in Curtis v Betts[3] that it was not necessary for the Plaintiff to show that the animal had abnormal characteristics which rendered it likely that any damage would be severe. In Wallace v Newton[4] it was held that on the true construction of section 2(2) of the 1971 Act the words à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“characteristics of the animal which are not normally found in animals of the same speciesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  were to be given their ordinary, natural meaning. The court said the plaintiff in that case was therefore not required to prove that the horse which caused damage had a vicious tendency to injure people by attacking them, but merely that the horse had characteristics of a kin d not normally found in horses. The case was distinguished on its facts by the court in Mirvahedy v Henley[5] where it was held that the keeper of an animal would incur strict liability under section 2(2)(b) if the animal had displayed characteristics which, while they were not normally found in an animal of the same species, were normal for the animal in particular circumstances. According to section 2(2) the animalà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s characteristics must also be known to its keeper if the claim against the keeper is to be successful. In the pre- 1971 Act case of Osborne v Chocqueel[6] the court said in order to support an action for damages for the bite of a dog it was necessary to show that the dog had to the defendants knowledge bitten or attempted to bite some person before it bit the plaintiff; it is not sufficient to show that it had to the defendants knowledge attacked and bitten a goat. In Breeden v Lampard[7] the plaintiff suffered injury when her horse was kicked by the d efendantà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s horse which had not kicked out before. Besides, there was nothing to suggest that the horse was anything more than a normal five-year old horse. The court held that the defendant horse rider was not in breach of the Animals Act 1971 or negligent in an accident where her horse kicked another rider, as she did not know of a propensity in that particular horse to kick another horse. Basically, section 4 of the Animals Act 1971 concerns liability for damage to land and property caused by trespassing livestock. As defined under section 11 of the Act, livestock means cattle, horses, asses, mules, hinnies, sheep, pigs, goats and poultry. Damage to land and property is not specifically mentioned under section 11. However, it can be said that damage to land and property is covered by section 11. As stated in section 4(2) livestock belongs to the person in whose possession it is. Such a person has immediate right to detain the livestock which has strayed on to t he land owned or occupied by him. The right of detention can only be exercised if at the time the livestock strayed on to the land it was not under anyoneà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s control[8] The right to detain the animal ceasesat the end of a period of 48 hours, unless within that period notice of the detention has been given to the officer in charge of a police station and also to the person to whom the livestock belongs, if the person exercising the right of detention knows that person.[9] The fact that the person to whom the livestock belongs is liable for the damage or expenses incurred as a result of the keeping of the trespassing livestock was shown in Morris v Blaenau Gwent District Council[10] where the court decided that the cost of catching and feeding the strayed animals qualified as expenses reasonably incurred within section 4 of the Act. An action under section 2(2) and one under section 4 have certain things in common. These include the fact that both provisions impose strict liability for damages caused by animals. Besides, in an action under both sections, a person is not liable for any damage which is wholly due to the fault of the person suffering it. Section 11 of the Act provides that à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“faultà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  has the same meaning as in the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945. To an appreciable extent, an action under section 2(2) and one under section 4 are not the same. A right to detain an animal exists only in relation to an action under section 4. Similarly, knowledge of an animalà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s unusual characteristics is necessary only in an action under section 2(2). Also, Section 5(2) provides that a person is not liable under section 2(2) of the Act for any damage suffered by a person who has voluntarily accepted the risk thereof. Section 5(3) also provides that a person is not liable under section 2(2) for any damage caused by an animal kept on any premises or structure to a person trespassing, if it is proved either that the animal was kept there for the protection of persons or property; or that keeping the animal there for that purpose was not unreasonable. Thus, it is only in an action under section 2(2) that issues such as à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“voluntary acceptance of riskà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  and à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“reasonableness of the purpose of keeping an animal on any premises or structureà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  will come into play. In Cummings v Granger[11] where the plaintiff brought an action under section 2(2), the defendant successfully pleaded these two defences. There are also some defences which are exclusive to an action under section 4. Section 5(5) provides that a person is not liable where livestock strayed from a highway and its presence was a lawful use of the highway. Damage will not be treated as due to the fault of the person suffering it merely on the ground that he could have prevented it by fencing. However, where it is proved that the damage would not have occurred but f or a breach of a duty to fence, there will be no liability: section 5(6). As far as an action under section 2(2) is concerned, all these matters are irrelevant. Bibliography Bagshaw, R. and McBride, N. J. (2005) Tort Law (Longman Law Series), Harrow: Longman Hodge, J. (2004) Tort Law, Devon: Willan Publisher Hodgson, J. and Lewthwaite, J. (2004) Tort Law Textbook, Oxford: Oxford University Press Rogers, W. V. H. (2006) Winfield and Jolowicz on Tort, London: Sweet Maxwell Rose, F. (2006) Blackstoneà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s Statutes on Contract, Tort and Restitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press Turner, C. (2007) Tort Law, London: Hodder Arnold Weir, T. (2006) An Introduction to Tort Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1 Footnotes [1] See section 11 of Animals Act 1971 [2] [2001] 2 All ER 982 [3] [1990] 1 All ER 769 [4] [1982] 2 All ER 106 [5] [2003] [6] [1896] 2 QB 109 [7] Unreported 21 March 1985 [8] Section 7(2) of the Animals Act 1971 [9] Section 7(3) of the Animals Act 1971 [10] The Times 6 July 1982 [11] [1977] 1 All ER 104

Should Pregnant Drug Abusers Be Charged With Child Abuse

Drugs abuse is a social issue that affects a considerable portion of the population within the United States. Drug issues, in general, is broad and complex given there are many different kinds of drugs with abuse potential and the people who use drugs can come from different social backgrounds. While pregnancy can be an exciting time period in a mother s life, it can also be a highly stressful time as well. New moms will have finances, their work schedule, and general health to consider. Now imagine you just found out you are pregnant, but you have been addicted to illicit drugs for months or even years. The discovery of your pregnancy could leave you in a state of panic. Certain addictions more difficult to overcome from than others. There are times that simply stopping drugs with no help is not at all possible. We known drugs can have short-term and long-term effects on the fetus/baby. The question becomes: Should pregnant drug abusers be charged with child abuse? In July 2014, new s surfaced that a Tennessee woman was the first to be charged in the state after a change in law made it a criminal offense to use drugs while pregnant. The woman, named Mallory Loyola, was charged with assault due to her addiction to meth (Mohney, 2014). Drug abuse, specifically while pregnant, has been around for countless decades. The problem is coming back into light recently, but decades ago in the mid 1980 s there was a major uproar. The term crack babies became commonShow MoreRelatedPregnant Womens Temporary Satisfaction and Long Term Consequences1500 Words   |  6 PagesA growing issue that continues to go on today is the drug and alcohol abuse by pregnant women. This has become a growing issue due to the fact that pregnancy is starting at a much younger age. Women tend to become pregnant around the age of 15 to 44 (â€Å"Birth Data†). In young women among the ages of 18 to 24, the alcohol and tobacco rates were 25.5 percent and 15.5 percent, respectively (Chen). A s of 2001, about 12 percent of all pregnant women admitted to consuming alcohol during their pregnancy (Burd)Read MoreTeens and Domestic Violence1336 Words   |  5 Pagesfighting. It’s reported that victims of domestic violence often use drugs engage in unhealthy diet behaviors (taking diet pills or laxatives and vomiting to lose weight), engage in risky sexual behaviors. This is putting the victims at higher risk for substance abuse, eating disorders, risky sexual behavior and further domestic violence. Also being physically or sexually abused makes teen girls six times more likely to become pregnant and twice as likely to get a STI. Victims may also carry the patternsRead MoreThe Impact of Drugs on Society3805 Words   |  16 PagesThe Impact of Drugs on Society Drugs have effects on society in many different ways. The negative consequences of drug abuse affect not only individuals who abuse drugs but also their families and friends, various businesses, and government resources. The ONDCP (2202) discusses the effects of drug abuse. â€Å"Although many of these affects cannot be quantified, ONDCP reported that in 2002, the economic cost of drug abuse to the United States was $180.9 billion.†(www.usdoj.gov ) DevastatingRead MoreEssentials Of Health Policy And Law2548 Words   |  11 PagesManju Thankachan Union University Essentials of Health Policy and Law - Health Policy Analysis Problem Statement What action should President Obama take to attenuate the problem of drug abuse among expecting mothers during pregnancy? Background In the United States, there has been a growing concern for the number of newborn children that have been exposed to drugs while in utero. The defenseless fetus is subject to any and all substances that the mother ingests, injects, or inhales into herRead MoreShould Juveniles Be Treated As Adults?1268 Words   |  6 PagesSince the Juvenile Justice Court (JJC) was first established there has been a debate on when, and whether or not, Juveniles should be treated as adults when they commit heinous crimes. Prior to the establishment of the JJC, parents were responsible for the actions of their kids under the age of seven; juveniles were tried as adults. By establishing the JJC, teenagers were given privileges they previously had not held; such as being treated as delinquents rather than criminals when committing crimesRead MoreThe Separation Of Mother And Baby2154 Words   |  9 Pages A law passed recently in Tennessee allows the state to criminally charge pregnant women with assault if their child is born testing positive for illicit drugs or has been harmed due to drug use. Tennessee is the first state in the United States to pass this law. The only way a woman can mitigate the legal consequences is if she voluntarily enrolls herself into long-term drug rehabilitation treatment and completes the program during or after her pregnancy. There are two social problems that areRead MoreThe Lifelong Affects and Consequences of Domestic Violence3981 Words   |  16 Pagesbeen proven to have an unhealthy impact on the victims exposed to the violence. Most people do not realize the scope of the potential adverse affects that domestic violence has on adult victims, pregnant victims, children and adolescents that are exposed to the type of behavior. When a woman is pregnant and becomes a victim of domestic violence, she is not the only one affected, but her fetus is as w ell. Domestic violence has been linked to physical, mental and emotional damage to its victims whichRead More Child Abuse and Neglect Essay example2770 Words   |  12 Pages Child abuse is the intentional omission of care by a parent or guardian that can cause a child to be hurt, maimed, or even killed. Child abuse can be either physical, mental, emotional or sexual. Because of child abuse, Caprice Ried will never do the things that a normal four-year old does. She will never play on a playground, or go to a sleepover, and never go to school. All of this was taken away from her at such a young age, when she died of child abuse. The foster parents, Patricia CokerRead MoreSubstance Abuse15082 Words   |  61 PagesMEANT BY DRUG DEPENDENCY? Drug dependence is a situation where an addict feels he/she must have drugs in order to live; this is the term to describe psychological dependence. Physical dependence occurs when the body metabolism adapts to the presence of the drugs, when the drug is removed strong withdrawal symptoms are produced. This withdrawal syndrome is experienced as sickness, stomach upset and muscular pain. Hallucinations and convulsions may also occur. EXPLAIN WHY ALCOHOL IS A DRUG AlcoholRead MoreDomestic Violence And Its Effects On Children Essay2003 Words   |  9 PagesDomestic violence is physical or verbal abuse in the family most commonly used among spouses. Domestic violence is an issue facing this world in families across the world. People should learn more about domestic violence and ways to prevent it in their homes. Researchers have reported percentages of domestic violence in Timor-Leste differ across the nation’s thirteen districts, and are developed higher among urban than rural women (Meiksin, et al, 2015). This problem has many different controversial